Table I

Comparison of JHA issues: Pre-Maastricht, post-Maastricht and post-Amsterdam

  Pre-Maastricht Post-Maastricht
Third Pillar
Post-Amsterdam First Pillar
(Communitarized areas of
former Third Pillar)
1999-2004 Post-2004
Asylum,
Immigration,
External
Borders
Domestic policy-making giving way to intergovernmental cooperation outside the Community framework Third Pillar, Title VI, Article K of TEU Article 73 of Amsterdam Treaty
European
Parliament
No role Limited role Consultation for the first five years after Amsterdam Treaty takes effect, co-decision afterwards
European
Court of
Justice
No jurisdiction No jurisdiction Referral for an obligatory first ruling for national last-instance courts
Decision-
making
Intergovernmental negotations

Nonbinding decisions in the form of resolutions

Binding decisions in the form of treaties
Unanimity rule on all issues Council acts unanimously on proposals from Commission and member states for the first five years Council will act unanimously on a move towards qualified majority voting (with no need for national ratification of this decision)
Commission's
Right of
Initiative
None

Occasional observer status at intergovernmental meetings
Shared right of initative for the Commission and Member States Commission has shared right of initiative (member states have encouraged the Commission to assume an exclusive right for asylum issues) Commission has exclusive right of initiative in Title IIIa

Source: Maastricht and Amsterdam Treaties

Table II

The Evolving Role of the Commission in JHA/AFSJ

  Constitutional
Institutional   Constrained Empowered
Constrained Pre-Mastricht JHA
Actor
Post-Maastricht, Pre-Amsterdam
Weak Agent
Empowered Amsterdam – 2004
Strong Agent
Post-2004
Improved autonomy
(in immigration, asylum, and external borders)

 
 
 
 

Figure 1

The Organizational Structure of the Post-Amsterdam Prodi Commission in Justice and Home Affairs

Source: Adopted from (European Commission 1999d)


©2001 by Uçarer
formated and tagged by S.H.&MN , 10.5.2001