Table I

Research design

Analysis level /
methodology
Micro Macro
Quantitative
  Statistical analysis of amendments
in three Socrates procedures
  Statistical analysis of amendments
from 34 co-decision files
Qualitative
  • Interview data about
    three Socrates files
  • Text study of
    official Socrates documents
  • General interview data
  • Text study of
    general co-decision documents
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Table II

The Commission’s opinion on an amendment and its degree of adoption

Table 2

Source: Calculated on the basis of data from George Tsebelis.

Note: Number of missing values = 4. The categories “partially adopted” and “modified not as Parliament wanted” have been collapsed, as there were few cases in a number of their subcategories (cells).

 
 

Table III

Amendments to Socrates I: 1995-99

First reading Second reading
Number of EP
amendments
The Commission The Council Number of EP
amendments
The Commission The final text
104 accepts 48 accepts 29 22 accepts 18 includes 15
rejects 19 excludes 3
rejects 56 accepts 3 rejects 4 includes 1
rejects 53 excludes 3

Source: Calculated on the basis of official documents

Table IV

Amendments to the mid-term budgetary revision of Socrates I

First reading Second reading
Number of EP
amendments
The Commission The Council Number of EP
amendments
The Commission The final text
6 accepts 5 accepts 5 1 accepts 0 includes 0
rejects 0 excludes 0
rejects 1 accepts 0 rejects 1 includes 0
rejects 1 excludes 1

Source: Calculated on the basis of official documents

Table V

Table 5. Amendments to Socrates II: 2000-06

First reading Second reading
Number of EP
amendments
The Commission The Council Number of EP
amendments
The Commission The final text
54 accepts 34 accepts 25 14 accepts 13 includes 10
rejects 9 excludes 3
rejects 20 accepts 0 rejects 1 includes 0
rejects 20 excludes 1

Source: Calculated on the basis of official documents


©2003 by Rasmussen
formated and tagged by MN&KH, 17.10.2003